Please watch all of this testimony Nurse Nicole Sirotek gave at Senator Ron Johnson’s panel today. It is only 8:17 of your time. Take special note of where she says you will get the best care if you are sick.
It is horrifying, but all too real to those who have been closely following this situation for well over a year.
If you do not yet realize what is happening, please wake up. Everyone needs to be awake to this. After you watch this one, keep going down the page. The testimonies are heartbreaking and infuriating.
How long until people realize the absolute criminality that is taking place around this country all day, every day? There is a reason I said that if Nuremberg 2.0 doesn’t happen we have a very big problem in Things Will Never Be The Same Again.
Learning About The Great Depression
Can anyone provide info that refutes this? I’m assuming not, but would be happy to know this isn’t true. I’ve been following these folks and their legal cases. I’m pretty sure this is sadly legit.
https://rumble.com/vs0rgp-nuremberg-2.0-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-new-findings-are-enough-to-dismantle-ent.html
Can anyone provide info that refutes this? I’m assuming not, but would be happy to know this isn’t true. I’ve been following these folks and their legal cases. I’m pretty sure this is sadly legit.
https://rumble.com/vs0rgp-nuremberg-2.0-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-new-findings-are-enough-to-dismantle-ent.html
Can anyone provide info that refutes this? I’m assuming not, but would be happy to know this isn’t true. I’ve been following these folks and their legal cases. I’m pretty sure this is sadly legit.
https://rumble.com/vs0rgp-nuremberg-2.0-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-new-findings-are-enough-to-dismantle-ent.html
Can anyone provide info that refutes this? I’m assuming not, but would be happy to know this isn’t true. I’ve been following these folks and their legal cases. I’m pretty sure this is sadly legit.
https://rumble.com/vs0rgp-nuremberg-2.0-dr.-reiner-fuellmich-new-findings-are-enough-to-dismantle-ent.html
They aren’t even trying to hide it any longer.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bayer-executive-mrna-shots-are-gene-therapy-marketed-as-vaccines-to-gain-public-trust/
They aren’t even trying to hide it any longer.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bayer-executive-mrna-shots-are-gene-therapy-marketed-as-vaccines-to-gain-public-trust/
They aren’t even trying to hide it any longer.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bayer-executive-mrna-shots-are-gene-therapy-marketed-as-vaccines-to-gain-public-trust/
They aren’t even trying to hide it any longer.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bayer-executive-mrna-shots-are-gene-therapy-marketed-as-vaccines-to-gain-public-trust/
Anyone who has solid evidence that disputes or disproves anything in this post or the comments is free to share a link to that information. I strive to be correct and accurate and will gladly update information as it comes out.
Calling me and my readers insulting names means your comment will never get approved and displayed on my site.
Anyone who has solid evidence that disputes or disproves anything in this post or the comments is free to share a link to that information. I strive to be correct and accurate and will gladly update information as it comes out.
Calling me and my readers insulting names means your comment will never get approved and displayed on my site.
Anyone who has solid evidence that disputes or disproves anything in this post or the comments is free to share a link to that information. I strive to be correct and accurate and will gladly update information as it comes out.
Calling me and my readers insulting names means your comment will never get approved and displayed on my site.
Anyone who has solid evidence that disputes or disproves anything in this post or the comments is free to share a link to that information. I strive to be correct and accurate and will gladly update information as it comes out.
Calling me and my readers insulting names means your comment will never get approved and displayed on my site.
Is science dead? By Steve Kirsch
(Click over and read the entire thing and see the links)
Twenty four years ago (in 1998), I donated $2.5M to MIT. They named the auditorium in the EECS building named in my honor: the Kirsch Auditorium, Room 32-123.
I’ve never asked to speak in the auditorium until now.
I wanted to give a talk at MIT about what the science is telling us about the COVID vaccines and mask wearing and how science is being censored.
I also wanted an opportunity to defend myself against unfair accusations made in MIT’s Tech Review accusing me of being a “misinformation superspreader.”
Am I a misinformation superspreader? Or is MIT one by publishing their article?
Read my rebuttal and decide for yourself who is telling the truth. There were 652 comments, nearly all of them suggesting I sue MIT for defamation.
They couldn’t find a member of the MIT faculty who was willing to sponsor me to give a talk that would examine the possibility that MIT made a serious mistake that jeopardizes the lives of students, staff, and faculty
MIT requires a faculty sponsor for all talks and they said they couldn’t find one willing to sponsor my talk.
Therefore, students will not have the opportunity to consider that there may be an alternate hypothesis that better fits the evidence on the table.
I had always believed that MIT was above politics, but it is clear I was mistaken in that belief.
I have a message to the MIT faculty: you are on the wrong side of history.
There is ample evidence on the table now from credible sources that cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe.
This is why nobody will debate us. I even offered $1M to incentivize people to show up at the debate table. No takers. So I raised it to a “name your price” offer. Still no takers.
The MIT faculty doesn’t want to hear any of it. They will not let the MIT students hear any of it either.
The safety and efficacy of the vaccines shall not be questioned. The MIT faculty will not allow it.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-science-dead?utm_source=url
Is science dead? By Steve Kirsch
(Click over and read the entire thing and see the links)
Twenty four years ago (in 1998), I donated $2.5M to MIT. They named the auditorium in the EECS building named in my honor: the Kirsch Auditorium, Room 32-123.
I’ve never asked to speak in the auditorium until now.
I wanted to give a talk at MIT about what the science is telling us about the COVID vaccines and mask wearing and how science is being censored.
I also wanted an opportunity to defend myself against unfair accusations made in MIT’s Tech Review accusing me of being a “misinformation superspreader.”
Am I a misinformation superspreader? Or is MIT one by publishing their article?
Read my rebuttal and decide for yourself who is telling the truth. There were 652 comments, nearly all of them suggesting I sue MIT for defamation.
They couldn’t find a member of the MIT faculty who was willing to sponsor me to give a talk that would examine the possibility that MIT made a serious mistake that jeopardizes the lives of students, staff, and faculty
MIT requires a faculty sponsor for all talks and they said they couldn’t find one willing to sponsor my talk.
Therefore, students will not have the opportunity to consider that there may be an alternate hypothesis that better fits the evidence on the table.
I had always believed that MIT was above politics, but it is clear I was mistaken in that belief.
I have a message to the MIT faculty: you are on the wrong side of history.
There is ample evidence on the table now from credible sources that cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe.
This is why nobody will debate us. I even offered $1M to incentivize people to show up at the debate table. No takers. So I raised it to a “name your price” offer. Still no takers.
The MIT faculty doesn’t want to hear any of it. They will not let the MIT students hear any of it either.
The safety and efficacy of the vaccines shall not be questioned. The MIT faculty will not allow it.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-science-dead?utm_source=url
Is science dead? By Steve Kirsch
(Click over and read the entire thing and see the links)
Twenty four years ago (in 1998), I donated $2.5M to MIT. They named the auditorium in the EECS building named in my honor: the Kirsch Auditorium, Room 32-123.
I’ve never asked to speak in the auditorium until now.
I wanted to give a talk at MIT about what the science is telling us about the COVID vaccines and mask wearing and how science is being censored.
I also wanted an opportunity to defend myself against unfair accusations made in MIT’s Tech Review accusing me of being a “misinformation superspreader.”
Am I a misinformation superspreader? Or is MIT one by publishing their article?
Read my rebuttal and decide for yourself who is telling the truth. There were 652 comments, nearly all of them suggesting I sue MIT for defamation.
They couldn’t find a member of the MIT faculty who was willing to sponsor me to give a talk that would examine the possibility that MIT made a serious mistake that jeopardizes the lives of students, staff, and faculty
MIT requires a faculty sponsor for all talks and they said they couldn’t find one willing to sponsor my talk.
Therefore, students will not have the opportunity to consider that there may be an alternate hypothesis that better fits the evidence on the table.
I had always believed that MIT was above politics, but it is clear I was mistaken in that belief.
I have a message to the MIT faculty: you are on the wrong side of history.
There is ample evidence on the table now from credible sources that cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe.
This is why nobody will debate us. I even offered $1M to incentivize people to show up at the debate table. No takers. So I raised it to a “name your price” offer. Still no takers.
The MIT faculty doesn’t want to hear any of it. They will not let the MIT students hear any of it either.
The safety and efficacy of the vaccines shall not be questioned. The MIT faculty will not allow it.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-science-dead?utm_source=url
Is science dead? By Steve Kirsch
(Click over and read the entire thing and see the links)
Twenty four years ago (in 1998), I donated $2.5M to MIT. They named the auditorium in the EECS building named in my honor: the Kirsch Auditorium, Room 32-123.
I’ve never asked to speak in the auditorium until now.
I wanted to give a talk at MIT about what the science is telling us about the COVID vaccines and mask wearing and how science is being censored.
I also wanted an opportunity to defend myself against unfair accusations made in MIT’s Tech Review accusing me of being a “misinformation superspreader.”
Am I a misinformation superspreader? Or is MIT one by publishing their article?
Read my rebuttal and decide for yourself who is telling the truth. There were 652 comments, nearly all of them suggesting I sue MIT for defamation.
They couldn’t find a member of the MIT faculty who was willing to sponsor me to give a talk that would examine the possibility that MIT made a serious mistake that jeopardizes the lives of students, staff, and faculty
MIT requires a faculty sponsor for all talks and they said they couldn’t find one willing to sponsor my talk.
Therefore, students will not have the opportunity to consider that there may be an alternate hypothesis that better fits the evidence on the table.
I had always believed that MIT was above politics, but it is clear I was mistaken in that belief.
I have a message to the MIT faculty: you are on the wrong side of history.
There is ample evidence on the table now from credible sources that cannot be explained if the vaccines are safe.
This is why nobody will debate us. I even offered $1M to incentivize people to show up at the debate table. No takers. So I raised it to a “name your price” offer. Still no takers.
The MIT faculty doesn’t want to hear any of it. They will not let the MIT students hear any of it either.
The safety and efficacy of the vaccines shall not be questioned. The MIT faculty will not allow it.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/is-science-dead?utm_source=url