• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

A Quiet Simple Life | Sallie Borrink

A Quiet Simple Life

  • Blog
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Homeschooling
    • Homeschool Planning
    • Back-to-Homeschool
    • Picture Book Activities
    • Gifted & 2e
    • Unit Studies
  • Free Printables
    • Free Homeschool Printables
    • Free Simple Living Printables
  • Building Your Family Life
    • Simple Living
    • Gracious Christian Parenting
  • Steadfast Christian Faith
    • Scripture Library
    • Christian Quotes
  • The Shop
    • Explore The Shop
    • Your Cart
    • Your Account Details
      • View Your Orders
      • Go To Your Downloads
      • My Account
    • Lost Password Help
    • Digital Products Terms of Use
  • Recent Comments
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Steadfast Christian Faith / Men & Women in the Body of Christ / Biblical Egalitarians / Defining Complementarian and Egalitarian on a Spectrum



Archives

Defining Complementarian and Egalitarian on a Spectrum

Saturday, November 17, 2012 (Updated: Tuesday, May 19, 2026)
7 Comments

Post may contain affiliate links. Read my disclosure statement.

The terms complementarian and egalitarian are used all the time, but they are’t two simple terms. There can be quite a lot of nuance for each one. For example, what someone might mean when they identify as one or the other may not be at all what the other person envisions. So it’s interesting to consider what kind of complementarian or egalitarian you might be.

Complementarian and Egalitarian Spectrum

Adrian Warnock’s suggested his own overview of the full spectrum of complementarianism and egalitarianism. He breaks them down into:




  • Patriarchy
  • Strong Complementarian
  • Moderate Complementarian
  • Soft Complementarian
  • Moderate Egalitarian
  • Strong Egalitarian
  • Extreme Feminist

I agree with his summaries for the most part. I think he’s a little more generous with the complementarian views in terms of couching them in more positive terms than he is with the egalitarian views. But, overall, I do agree with his breakdown as a helpful point of reference for discussion.

The Perceived Value of Men by Feminists

His definition of Extreme Feminist is interesting, especially the idea that Extreme Feminists basically devalue men. I think he is right that only the Extreme Feminists devalue men. I’ve yet to meet any Christian Egalitarian of any kind who doesn’t fully appreciate and see the value of both men and women.

Christian Egalitarianism by its very definition rejoices in the importance of both men and women.

Feminism in the Church

Now, in light of his breakdown and after considering where you and others you know might fall on the spectrum, consider this conversation from 2006 entitled “Feminism in Your Church” with

  • Mark Dever (The Gospel Coalition)
  • CJ Mahaney (Sovereign Grace Ministries)
  • Russell Moore (Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary)
  • Randy Stinson (President of Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood)

If you listen to the first five or ten minutes you will get the general gist of their views.

Perhaps most striking to me is that in their minds Egalitarianism = Feminism.

And they sum up Feminism in one word – wrong.

One of them thinks Feminism started in the 1960’s and another one thinks it started in the Garden. They never really say which it is.

So according to them, feminism started sometime in the past 50 years (give or take 6,000 years). In their discussion of Feminism, Feminism is just wrong, wrong, wrong and a literal threat to the Gospel. It is a Gospel issue.

Even more striking, consider that they believe most people in the church are feminists and don’t realize it. And most people in the church are even in same-sex marriages and don’t even know that! Did you know you are in a same-sex marriage? I bet a lot of you are!  This is what they said:

Why is this topic important?

Because most of the people in their churches are feminists and most of the people in our churches are in same-sex marriages right now, they just don’t just realize it. Because you have people who have marriages in which you do not have male headship, in which you do not have male protection, and you do not have provision for wives and so this is not a theoretical issue, this is something that is a gospel issue.

That’s why Paul says a man who does not provide for his family is worse than an infidel. . . .

. . . There are gospel implications for wives taking their children to day care in the morning and picking them up in the afternoon.

Yes, if you are a working woman or take your children to daycare or live in a home where the man isn’t in charge the way these men think he should be, YOU are in a same-sex marriage. 

Seriously. Listen to it for yourself. It is in the first ten minutes.

Complementarianism Definition

Is this your definition of complementarianism?

Do you think couples who are basically not patriarchal are in a same-sex marriage? 

That’s what these men said in 2006 and not one of them said that was an inappropriate statement. They all let it go right into the discussion. This discussion is still up and available on their website six years later. It’s not like I had to use the Wayback Machine to dig it up.

These are the men defining complementarianism today. These are the men training pastors, writing books, speaking at conferences, and teaching a huge audience via the internet.

So unless you are a hardline patriarchalist, tonight when you go to bed you can tell your spouse the good news you discovered today. You are in a same-sex marriage!

Category: Biblical Egalitarians | Complementarian vs. Egalitarian | Complementarians | Reformed PatriarchyTag: 9Marks

About Sallie Borrink

Sallie Schaaf Borrink is a Christian, wife, mother, homeschooler, homebody, and autodidact. She owns a home-based graphic design and web design business with her husband (DavidandSallie.com).

You Might Also Like

A Woman’s Faith is Her Own | Sarah in Hebrews 11:11-12

Rachel Held Evans, Mary Kassian, The Gospel Coalition, and A Year of Biblical Womanhood

Silencing Women at Midweek Prayer Meetings in Reformed Patriarchy

Previous Post:Mark Driscoll’s New Sermon Series on Esther
Next Post:The Fourth Turning & How It Impacts the Body of Christ

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paula

    Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 10:33 pm

    His little chart made me laugh. I just don’t fit into any of those categories. And it’s even funnier when I realize that my husband and I disagree on this topic and we both think that’s okay. 😉

    Reply
  2. Sallie

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 8:13 am

    Paula – Would you be willing to share what keeps you from identifying with any of the groups? I could not put myself in one exact group either.

    Reply
  3. Sergius Martin-George

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 7:25 pm

    What is “provision for wives” supposed to mean?

    Reply
  4. Kristen Rosser

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    I guess that’s what happens when you define manhood as being in authority over a woman, and you define womanhood as being under the authority of a man. If authority = manhood, then not being in authority as they define it, means you’re not a man.

    How sad.

    Reply
  5. Angie

    Monday, November 19, 2012 at 11:08 am

    This argumentation, does it not, undermines actual same-sex (same genitalia) marriage? If sex is determined by behavior (i.e. authority=male; submission=female) then what can be determined at the birth of a baby because neither of these behaviors is observable? Also, marriage can be negotiated between two individuals of the same actual sex (genitalia) but not be “same-sex” by their argument because they perform different roles or behaviors. This seems like bad logic and argumentation.

    Reply
  6. Natasha

    Monday, November 19, 2012 at 11:33 am

    Okay, so these fellows are going to ignore the fact that 1 Timothy 5:8 when taken in context with verse 16 is almost certainly referring more to women than men (the original phrase is gender neutral not masculine in any case)?
    Yeah, awkward that verse 16. Women supposed to be providing for the widows. Oh, it must mean their husbands not really the women. Except the verse doesn’t actually say that…
    You gotta wonder how the “plain meaning of the text” doesn’t seem to apply in this case. *eye roll*

    Reply
  7. Stephanie

    Saturday, December 1, 2012 at 9:00 pm

    The comment right before this(Natasha’s) echoes my one of my first thoughts while listening to this discussion…WHY do complementarians insist on using 1 Timothy 5:8 incorrectly? It doesn’t even take that much time to study this passage and understand that it isn’t even about husbands providing for wives. Yet I hear this verse used incorrectly over and over again to “prove” that husbands are the ones who should be the main provider in the family. How do people get away with such obvious deception??

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Thank you for your comment. I read and appreciate each one even if I am unable to respond.

Sidebar

Sallie Schaaf Borrink

I’m Sallie — wife, mother, just-retired homeschooler, and happy warrior for Christ. Our little family lives a quiet and cozy life of home education, self-employment, and pithy exchanges. I’ve been writing here for 20+ years as a curator of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. I don't peddle trendy aesthetics or ideas, but write about what I'm learning while thinking for myself. And I like to laugh. A lot. Start here. ♥

Search

Categories




Popular This Week

  • How Zionists Conquered American Christianity with the Scofield Bible SIMPLEHow Zionists Conquered American Christianity with the Scofield Bible
  • Philippians 4:8 KJV printable wall art in Cottage Rose and Daisies designsFree Philippians 4:8 KJV Printable Wall Art
  • Woman in pink sweater entering credit card info into tabletSubscription Fatigue Is Real
  • Caroline's Preschooler Christmas Tree SIMPLECaroline’s Preschooler Christmas Tree
  • Trees By Joyce Kilmer Printable SQUARE“Trees” by Joyce Kilmer | Printable Poem
  • Popular-Today-List-Avatar-SB-GIRL-80x80Guess the Baby Name!
  • Broom, wooden rake, metal trash can on brick floorPurge the Garage | Cozy Life Reset – Day 25
  • Free Picnic Word Search Printable SQUAREFree Picnic Word Search Printable
  • Free Canada Map Printable SQUARE 2Free Canada Map Printable for Homeschoolers
  • Classical Conversations Negatives and Why We Didn't Join SIMPLEClassical Conversations Negatives and Why We Didn’t Join

Popular Today In My Shop

  • Notes List 2Note Lists | A Sweet Year
  • "October’s Party" by George Cooper Printable“October’s Party” by George Cooper
  • Come, Little Leaves by George Cooper Printable preview“Come, Little Leaves” by George Cooper
  • Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening Printable“Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” by Robert Frost
  • Australia and New Zealand Fun Facts CopyworkAustralia & New Zealand Copywork | Print & Cursive Worksheets
  • 50 United States Maps plus DC Printables IMAGE50 Blank Printable U.S. State Maps (plus Washington, D.C.)
  • Thanksgiving Themed Learning Pack 042923Thanksgiving Themed Pack – Printable Worksheets & Activities
  • America Activity Pack 042823America Themed Pack – Printable Worksheets & Activities
  • Autumn Themed Learning Pack 042923Autumn Themed Pack – Printable Worksheets & Activities

What Can I Help You Find Today?

Home

About Sallie

Contact

Privacy Policy

Disclaimers & Disclosures

Subscribe

Make a Donation

Tags

My Telegram

My Printables Shop

My Account

Cart

Lost Password Help

Digital Products Terms of Use

Simple Living

Unit Studies & Learning Themes

Homeschooling

Free Printables

Copyright © 2005–2026 · A Quiet Simple Life · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme

Scroll Up
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.