Plans continue for the coronation of Charles to be King Charles III. Interestingly enough, there are three reasons he absolutely should not be crowned monarch. I’m going to offer a simple list today. You can dig more on any that interest you.

Charles’ Friendship With Jimmy Savile

First, Charles’ decades-long, intimate friendship with notorious pedophile Jimmy Savile should cast serious doubt on his ability to lead for multiple potential reasons. It either shows a clear lack of judgement or else a willingness to look the other way. Or worse. Just do a search. There are reams of articles.

Charles’ Commitment to the WEF, Klaus Schwab, The Great Reset, and Build Back Better

Second, Charles has sworn deep loyalty to the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, Build Back Better, and The Great Reset. He’s been one of the foremost proponents of the entire toxic, satanic mixture.

How can a man take an oath to stand for his people when he has a deep allegiance to an organization whose goal is to create a world where nations do not exist in any meaningful way and power is formally consolidated into the hands of a few? Just do a few searches for Prince Charles and Build Back Better, Prince Charles and the Great Reset, etc. Here’s a sample from Prince Charles calls for ‘vast military-style campaign’ to achieve ‘fundamental economic transition’:

In his Monday speech, Prince Charles said, “We need a vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector,” noting that the private sector has “trillions at its disposal, far beyond global GDP, and, with the greatest respect, beyond even the governments of the world’s leaders.”

“It offers the only real prospect of achieving fundamental economic transition,” he added.

The article points out:

Military campaign means top-down planning, executing, controlling. Communist economic system: Planned by a central authority and organized along a top-down chain of command.

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) November 1, 2021

I encourage you to click over and read that entire article, not just the quote I put here. Truly understand what these people want and what Charles is one of the biggest advocates for. How can he objectively look out for the interests of “his” people when he is a sworn globalist promoting the most dystopian of visions?

Charles Rejects Being Defender of the Faith

Third, Charles has expressed that he does not wish to take an oath to be the defender of The Faith. This is apparently an ongoing discussion even while events are being planned. Yes, the future monarch apparently does not wish to recognize the Christian faith is the basis of his crown, Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation, and that Christianity is by its very definition an exclusive faith. He wishes to be a defender of all faiths because he is a globalist.

That doesn’t work in a constitutional monarchy that has for centuries derived its legitimacy from the belief that the king or queen serves because God has put him or her in that position. The Church of England is largely apostate at this point, now teaching outright heresy in many areas. If they allow Charles to change the wording of the service and essentially eliminate Jesus Christ as the head of the church, I would not stand anywhere near any of these people. I wouldn’t want to get struck by the lightning bolt.

Charles should not be King. I have no idea if William would be any better. He may be as much of a globalist as his father. He may also reject salvation in Jesus Christ as the only way to our Heavenly Father. From things I’ve read, I get the sense that may be true. If both Charles and William reject Jesus Christ as the only way to salvation, the monarchy is officially dead. It may still function on some level, but it will have abdicated its spiritual function to the enemy of Jesus Christ. They either chose to follow Jesus Christ and the faith or they reject it. You either serve Jesus Christ or you serve his enemy. There is no third option in this world, even if people don’t realize it.

The subjects of the crown are about to realize the seriousness of these choices.

Photo credit