I have two recommended videos to share with you that are closely related. You will see overlap in the content, but each one is worth watching in full. Some of the best content in the first video is in the second half so I encourage you to watch all of it.
If these topics are new to you, I strongly encourage you to get up to speed as quickly as possible. Every time you understand something new about the situation in which we find ourselves, you empower yourself and have the potential to empower your loved ones.
If you follow the information I share in various places and watched the videos I shared in Vaccine Information From Doris Cahill, Ros Nealon-Cook, Ricardo Bosi, and Amazing Polly, then you are already aware of the mass psychosis we are currently living through. It’s estimated approximately 30% of people understand what is going on and are actively working against it. Another 30% are gripped or frozen by this psychosis and are religiously obeying the official narrative as a means of self-preservation. The other 40-50% know in their gut there is something very wrong, but they either can’t fully explain it or are afraid so they go along to get along and hope we can go back to the way things were before.
If you are in the 40-50%, it’s imperative that you fully grasp what is happening and move into the ranks of those who are fully awake to what is going on. You need to actively engage in pushing back against what is happening. As is said in the second video, we are at a time in history where you have to pick a side. There is no third option. By choosing to remain in the 40-50%, you will end up with those who are currently frozen in the mass psychosis group. If you know your history, you know that kind of situation never ever ends well.
If you don’t deliberately choose to move forward in the truth, you are choosing by default to walk in and support the lie. Fortunately you are here today and have the opportunity to hear the truth. Make the most of it.
Remember that the inclusion of a resource is not an endorsement of all of the content or the presenters themselves.
This is a great short follow-up to the previous video.
From the article linked at the end. It is definitely worth clicking over and reading the entire thing so you understand the context of this conversation.
NEAR BEGINNING OF ARTICLE:
“Andrew Hill, MD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.
Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.
On Jan. 6 of 2020, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.
Shortly before he published, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and one of the world’s leading medical research analysts, contacted Hill via Zoom and recorded the call (transcript below). Lawrie had learned of his new position and reached out to try to rectify the situation.
In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use.
Hill affirmed that the rate of death at that time was 15,000 people per day. At the 80 percent recovery rate using the drug, which Hill and Lawrie discussed earlier in the call, the number of preventable deaths incurred by such a delay would be staggering — as many as 504,000.
Lawrie was unable to persuade Hill, who instead of joining her team as lead author, went ahead and published his manipulated findings.
Four days before publication, Hill’s sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill’s employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill’s study.
In the call, Lawrie berated Hill’s study as “flawed,” “rushed,“ “not properly put together,” and “bad research . . . bad research,” which Hill appears not to have denied.
Instead, when pressed he admitted his sponsor, Unitaid, was an unacknowledged author of conclusions.
“Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah,” he told Lawrie.
Kennedy explained: “Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries . . . to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals” for distribution in Africa.
FROM ZOOM CONVERSATION:
Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.
Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.
Lawrie: You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.
Hill: Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.
Lawrie: But, Andy — know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.
Hill protests that the U.S. National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.
Lawrie: Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: That’s not something I know about.
Lawrie: Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.
Hill: I don’t think so.
Lawrie: Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.
Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful.
This is bad research … bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know … you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.
Hill: Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.
Lawrie: No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up … you know?
Hill: It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.
Lawrie: So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?
Hill: Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO [World Health Organization]and the NIH [National Institutes of Health]and the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.
Lawrie: How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.
Hill: Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future … at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.
Lawrie: It’s already nailed.
Hill: No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.
Lawrie: You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.
These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomized controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomized controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people …
I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So … we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do.
I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.
Lawrie then asks again: Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?
Hill: It’s Unitaid.
Lawrie: All right. So who helped to … Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?
Hill: Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it … Unitaid …
Lawrie: I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?
Hill: Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.
Lawrie: Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?
Hill: Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t …
Lawrie: So they have a say in your conclusions.
Hill: Yeah.
Lawrie: Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?
Hill: Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name … but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance …
Lawrie: Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?
Hill: Yeah … it’s a very strong lobby …
Lawrie: Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy.
I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground … You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.
And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry … As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.
Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.
Hill: Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.
Lawrie: So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?
Hill: From my side. Okay … I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’
Lawrie: How many people die every day?
Hill: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.
Lawrie: Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks … because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum …
Lawrie: You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth.”
Hill: What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.
https://www.worldtribune.com/researcher-andrew-hills-conflict-a-40-million-gates-foundation-grant-vs-a-half-million-human-lives/
Viral immunologist, Dr. Jessica Rose, on the safety of vaccines in pregnant women
“82% of the women in the study lost their baby in their 1st or 2nd trimester”
https://t.me/chiefnerd/549
Full interview (which I have not watched):
https://rumble.com/vouo1t-gal-shalev-interview-with-dr.-jessica-rose-interview-vaers-data.html
Viral immunologist, Dr. Jessica Rose, on the safety of vaccines in pregnant women
“82% of the women in the study lost their baby in their 1st or 2nd trimester”
https://t.me/chiefnerd/549
Full interview (which I have not watched):
https://rumble.com/vouo1t-gal-shalev-interview-with-dr.-jessica-rose-interview-vaers-data.html
“Elsevier is going to be slaughtered on this”
https://youtu.be/HXH573bRSZQ
“Elsevier is going to be slaughtered on this”
https://youtu.be/HXH573bRSZQ
READ THIS. ALL OF IT.
https://westernstandardonline.com/2021/12/slobodian-a-cautionary-tale-about-vaccinating-your-children/
READ THIS. ALL OF IT.
https://westernstandardonline.com/2021/12/slobodian-a-cautionary-tale-about-vaccinating-your-children/
Louisiana Nurse: “We Have Had More Children Die From The COVID Vaccine Than Of COVID Itself – The Madness Has to Stop!”
https://t.me/healthimpact/335
Louisiana Nurse: “We Have Had More Children Die From The COVID Vaccine Than Of COVID Itself – The Madness Has to Stop!”
https://t.me/healthimpact/335
Robert Malone Vaccine Information For Parents (PDF)
https://sallieborrink.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Talking_Points_-_Malone.pdf
Robert Malone Vaccine Information For Parents (PDF)
https://sallieborrink.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Talking_Points_-_Malone.pdf
Someone on CBS actually told the truth. I’m honestly shocked this hasn’t been scrubbed from the internet by now.
Imagine if she had also told the truth about what the jabs are doing and will be doing to the children in the years and decades ahead.
One step at a time.
https://twitter.com/FaceTheNation/status/1475209878415323140
Someone on CBS actually told the truth. I’m honestly shocked this hasn’t been scrubbed from the internet by now.
Imagine if she had also told the truth about what the jabs are doing and will be doing to the children in the years and decades ahead.
One step at a time.
https://twitter.com/FaceTheNation/status/1475209878415323140
Eastport-South Manor School District (Suffolk, County, NY) sends letter to Governor Hochul on November 23, 2021, expressing concern regarding mandating jabs in children
Read letter here (PDF)
In December, the school sent out the following message to K-12 parents seen in screenshot below. Here is part of the text describing they have hired a special doctor and developed plans to deal with Sudden Cardiac Arrest in a K-12 SCHOOL DISTRICT:
I was a teacher. We NEVER EVER had to plan for ‘Sudden Cardiac Arrest” in our students. Why is this happening?
Eastport-South Manor School District (Suffolk, County, NY) sends letter to Governor Hochul on November 23, 2021, expressing concern regarding mandating jabs in children
Read letter here (PDF)
In December, the school sent out the following message to K-12 parents seen in screenshot below. Here is part of the text describing they have hired a special doctor and developed plans to deal with Sudden Cardiac Arrest in a K-12 SCHOOL DISTRICT:
I was a teacher. We NEVER EVER had to plan for ‘Sudden Cardiac Arrest” in our students. Why is this happening?
Estimated 1 in 95 boys diagnosed with myocarditis in a California private school
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/estimated-1-in-95-boys-diagnosed
Estimated 1 in 95 boys diagnosed with myocarditis in a California private school
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/estimated-1-in-95-boys-diagnosed
Tell me again they aren’t coming for the kids in every possible way. Please click over and read. This is a total battle against every facet of our lives.
https://dailycaller.com/2022/01/21/elementary-school-to-hold-blm-event-teaching-kindergarten-first-graders-to-disrupt-the-nuclear-family-recognize-trans-antagonistic-violence/
Tell me again they aren’t coming for the kids in every possible way. Please click over and read. This is a total battle against every facet of our lives.
https://dailycaller.com/2022/01/21/elementary-school-to-hold-blm-event-teaching-kindergarten-first-graders-to-disrupt-the-nuclear-family-recognize-trans-antagonistic-violence/
Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide
It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies
Dr Naomi Wolf
“I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me.
The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.
The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years. By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.
The lies revealed are stunning.”
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dear-friends-sorry-to-announce-a?s=r
Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide
It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies
Dr Naomi Wolf
“I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me.
The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.
The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years. By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.
The lies revealed are stunning.”
https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dear-friends-sorry-to-announce-a?s=r
It’s been over a year since I wrote this post. Now the doctors and scientists who tried to warn people are being let back on Twitter. Simply scroll through Dr. McCullough’s feed and see if I was being an alarmist or spreading lies.
What has been done is beyond devastating.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD
It’s been over a year since I wrote this post. Now the doctors and scientists who tried to warn people are being let back on Twitter. Simply scroll through Dr. McCullough’s feed and see if I was being an alarmist or spreading lies.
What has been done is beyond devastating.
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1608818623971495942
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1608818623971495942