• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Sallie Schaaf Borrink

  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Premium Content
    • Purchase Premium Access
    • Premium Member Log-in
  • Categories
        • Free Printables
        • Gifted & 2e
        • Gracious Christian Parenting
        • Homemaking
        • Homeschooling
        • Our Family Stories
        • Questioning the Narrative
        • Rebuilding America
        • Simple Living
        • Unit Studies & Learning Themes
        • Tags
  • My Printables Shop
    • The Lifetime Pass
    • Explore The Shop
    • Your Cart
    • Your Account Details
      • View Your Orders
      • Go To Your Downloads
      • My Account
    • Lost Password Help
    • Digital Products Terms of Use
  • Comments
  • Forum
    • Login
    • Sign Up
  • Search

Welcome & Miscellaneous

See the sidebar for all categories

Start Here

Subscribe

Donate

Tags

Sallie’s Rebuilding America – My News Analysis Website

My Recommendations

The Shop

Explore The Shop

The Lifetime Shopping Pass

Your Cart

Digital Products Terms of Use

Your Account

View Your Orders

Go To Your Downloads

Lost Password Help

Cozy & Simple Living

Simple Living

Homemaking

Our Cozy Family Life

The Prudent & Prepared Homemaker

Free Homemaking Printables

Holidays & Traditions

Comfort Food Recipes

Health

Home Education & Parenting

Home Education

Discipleship Homeschooling

Gracious Christian Parenting

Gifted/2e Parenting for Christians

Homeschooling a Creative Child

Homeschool Mom Encouragement

Homeschool Planning

Gifted/2e Homeschooling

Unit Studies & Themes

Unit Studies & Resources

Unit Studies

Unit Study Activities

Poetry

Christian Faith

Christian Faith

Prayer

Marriage

Bible Readings & Christian Devotionals

Morning Hope

Eventide Blessing

Streams in the Desert

You are here: Home / Complementarian, Egalitarian, and Patriarchy / Complementarian / Defining Complementarian and Egalitarian on a Spectrum




Archives

Defining Complementarian and Egalitarian on a Spectrum

Saturday, November 17, 2012 (Updated: Saturday, November 15, 2025)
7 Comments

Post may contain affiliate links. Read my disclosure statement.

The terms complementarian and egalitarian are used all the time, but they are’t two simple terms. There can be quite a lot of nuance for each one. For example, what someone might mean when they identify as one or the other may not be at all what the other person envisions. So it’s interesting to consider what kind of complementarian or egalitarian you might be.

Complementarian and Egalitarian Spectrum

Adrian Warnock’s suggested his own overview of the full spectrum of complementarianism and egalitarianism. He breaks them down into:



  • Patriarchy
  • Strong Complementarian
  • Moderate Complementarian
  • Soft Complementarian
  • Moderate Egalitarian
  • Strong Egalitarian
  • Extreme Feminist

I agree with his summaries for the most part. I think he’s a little more generous with the complementarian views in terms of couching them in more positive terms than he is with the egalitarian views. But, overall, I do agree with his breakdown as a helpful point of reference for discussion.

The Perceived Value of Men by Feminists

His definition of Extreme Feminist is interesting, especially the idea that Extreme Feminists basically devalue men. I think he is right that only the Extreme Feminists devalue men. I’ve yet to meet any Christian Egalitarian of any kind who doesn’t fully appreciate and see the value of both men and women.

Christian Egalitarianism by its very definition rejoices in the importance of both men and women.

Feminism in the Church

Now, in light of his breakdown and after considering where you and others you know might fall on the spectrum, consider this conversation from 2006 entitled “Feminism in Your Church” with

  • Mark Dever (The Gospel Coalition)
  • CJ Mahaney (Sovereign Grace Ministries)
  • Russell Moore (Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary)
  • Randy Stinson (President of Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood)

If you listen to the first five or ten minutes you will get the general gist of their views.

Perhaps most striking to me is that in their minds Egalitarianism = Feminism.

And they sum up Feminism in one word – wrong.

One of them thinks Feminism started in the 1960’s and another one thinks it started in the Garden. They never really say which it is.

So according to them, feminism started sometime in the past 50 years (give or take 6,000 years). In their discussion of Feminism, Feminism is just wrong, wrong, wrong and a literal threat to the Gospel. It is a Gospel issue.

Even more striking, consider that they believe most people in the church are feminists and don’t realize it. And most people in the church are even in same-sex marriages and don’t even know that! Did you know you are in a same-sex marriage? I bet a lot of you are!  This is what they said:

Why is this topic important?

Because most of the people in their churches are feminists and most of the people in our churches are in same-sex marriages right now, they just don’t just realize it. Because you have people who have marriages in which you do not have male headship, in which you do not have male protection, and you do not have provision for wives and so this is not a theoretical issue, this is something that is a gospel issue.

That’s why Paul says a man who does not provide for his family is worse than an infidel. . . .

. . . There are gospel implications for wives taking their children to day care in the morning and picking them up in the afternoon.

Yes, if you are a working woman or take your children to daycare or live in a home where the man isn’t in charge the way these men think he should be, YOU are in a same-sex marriage. 

Seriously. Listen to it for yourself. It is in the first ten minutes.

Complementarianism Definition

Is this your definition of complementarianism?

Do you think couples who are basically not patriarchal are in a same-sex marriage? 

That’s what these men said in 2006 and not one of them said that was an inappropriate statement. They all let it go right into the discussion. This discussion is still up and available on their website six years later. It’s not like I had to use the Wayback Machine to dig it up.

These are the men defining complementarianism today. These are the men training pastors, writing books, speaking at conferences, and teaching a huge audience via the internet.

So unless you are a hardline patriarchalist, tonight when you go to bed you can tell your spouse the good news you discovered today. You are in a same-sex marriage!

Category: Complementarian | Egalitarian | Marriage | Reformed PatriarchyTag: 9Marks

About Sallie Borrink

Sallie Schaaf Borrink is a wife, mother, homebody, and autodidact. She’s a published author, former teacher, and former campus ministry staff member. Sallie owns a home-based graphic design and web design business with her husband (DavidandSallie.com).

You Might Also Like

The Real Reasons for the Decline in Church Attendance?

9 Ways Complementarians Unfairly Characterize and Dismiss Christian Egalitarians

Weddings: So If You Could Do It Over Again…

Previous Post:Mark Driscoll’s New Sermon Series on Esther, the Slut
Next Post:The Theory of the Fourth Turning | How It Impacts the Body of Christ

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paula

    Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 10:33 pm

    His little chart made me laugh. I just don’t fit into any of those categories. And it’s even funnier when I realize that my husband and I disagree on this topic and we both think that’s okay. 😉

    Reply
  2. Sallie

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 8:13 am

    Paula – Would you be willing to share what keeps you from identifying with any of the groups? I could not put myself in one exact group either.

    Reply
  3. Sergius Martin-George

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 7:25 pm

    What is “provision for wives” supposed to mean?

    Reply
  4. Kristen Rosser

    Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    I guess that’s what happens when you define manhood as being in authority over a woman, and you define womanhood as being under the authority of a man. If authority = manhood, then not being in authority as they define it, means you’re not a man.

    How sad.

    Reply
  5. Angie

    Monday, November 19, 2012 at 11:08 am

    This argumentation, does it not, undermines actual same-sex (same genitalia) marriage? If sex is determined by behavior (i.e. authority=male; submission=female) then what can be determined at the birth of a baby because neither of these behaviors is observable? Also, marriage can be negotiated between two individuals of the same actual sex (genitalia) but not be “same-sex” by their argument because they perform different roles or behaviors. This seems like bad logic and argumentation.

    Reply
  6. Natasha

    Monday, November 19, 2012 at 11:33 am

    Okay, so these fellows are going to ignore the fact that 1 Timothy 5:8 when taken in context with verse 16 is almost certainly referring more to women than men (the original phrase is gender neutral not masculine in any case)?
    Yeah, awkward that verse 16. Women supposed to be providing for the widows. Oh, it must mean their husbands not really the women. Except the verse doesn’t actually say that…
    You gotta wonder how the “plain meaning of the text” doesn’t seem to apply in this case. *eye roll*

    Reply
  7. Stephanie

    Saturday, December 1, 2012 at 9:00 pm

    The comment right before this(Natasha’s) echoes my one of my first thoughts while listening to this discussion…WHY do complementarians insist on using 1 Timothy 5:8 incorrectly? It doesn’t even take that much time to study this passage and understand that it isn’t even about husbands providing for wives. Yet I hear this verse used incorrectly over and over again to “prove” that husbands are the ones who should be the main provider in the family. How do people get away with such obvious deception??

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Thank you for your comment. I read and appreciate each one even if I am unable to respond.

Sidebar

Sallie Schaaf Borrink

For 20+ years, I’ve been writing about following Jesus Christ and making choices based on what is true, beautiful, and eternal. Through purposeful living, self-employment, and homeschooling, our family has learned that freedom comes from a commitment to examine all of life and think for yourself. 

I hope you will join me here where we discuss all of life each day.

Categories

Search

Access all of my Premium Content for just $10/month

All of my printables for just $37!

Popular Today

  • Popular-Today-List-Avatar-SB-GIRL-80×80Forum
  • Becoming Useful For the Kingdom is Inefficient SIMPLEBecoming Useful For the Kingdom Is Inefficient
  • Classical Conversations Negatives and Why We Didn’t Join SIMPLEClassical Conversations Negatives and Why We Didn’t Join
  • How Zionists Conquered American Christianity with the Scofield Bible SIMPLEHow Zionists Conquered American Christianity with the Scofield Bible
  • October’s Party by George Cooper – Printable Poetry SIMPLE“October’s Party” by George Cooper | Printable Poem
  • Should I Have My Gifted Child TestedShould I Have My Gifted Child Tested?
  • Free May Day Printable Word Search POSTFree May Day Word Search Printable
  • Free Groundhog Day Printable Word Search POSTFree Groundhog Day Word Search Printable
  • Christian and Patriotic Holidays List SIMPLE2025-2027 Christian & Patriotic Holidays List | Free Printables
  • Free Spring Printable Word Search POSTFree Spring Word Search Printable
  • Morning Hope – Romans 14 SIMPLERomans 14
  • A colorful image of sacred geometry related to MegatronExplaining Metatron from an Orthodox/Historical Christian Perspective




A Christian Nation

"The real object of the first amendment was not to countenance, much less to advance, Mahometanism, or Judaism, or infidelity, by prostrating Christianity; but to exclude all rivalry among christian sects, and to prevent any national ecclesiastical establishment, which should give to a hierarchy the exclusive patronage of the national government."

Joseph Story (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court), Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833), § 1871.

countenance: To favor; to encourage by opinion or words; To encourage; to appear in defense (Websters Dictionary 1828)




What Can I Help You Find Today?

Home

About Sallie

Contact

Privacy Policy

Disclaimers & Disclosures

Tags

Premium Content

Subscribe

Comments

Forum

Make a Donation

My Printables Shop

The Lifetime Pass

My Account

Cart

Lost Password Help

Digital Products Terms of Use

Rebuilding America

Free Printables

Unit Studies & Learning Themes

Homeschooling

Copyright © 2005–2026 · Sallie Schaaf Borrink · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme

Scroll Up
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.