Someone described Dr. Bhattacharya becoming head of the NIH as a kind of Haman and Mordecai story from the Bible. If you weren’t paying attention at the time, Dr. Bhattacharya was one of three top-of-their-field experts who penned the Great Barrington Declaration. He stood up for the truth about the covid situation very early on and was censored and vilified.
Dr. Bhattacharya may be one of Trump’s best picks, second only to Holman (Border Czar). I say may because we haven’t seen how he will handle things. He was correct about the lockdowns. Let’s hope he is correct about other things moving forward.
Screenshots first and then some Twitter/X links embedded so you can watch short videos.
Dr. Bhattacharya Attacked By Collins, Fauci

Francis Collins will go down very poorly in history, especially given that he used Christianity to manipulate, guilt, and lie to people.

Dr. Death himself

Google Hid Great Barrington Declaration
In case you forgot, Google hid the Great Barrington Declaration. I had forgotten about this until I went back and looked for it in my archived forum. This is what I wrote at the time:
Google is hiding The Great Barrington Declaration. Can’t have the peasants thinking for themselves. Oh wait. Those weren’t peasants who wrote that. It was people in the very top of their fields.

Dr. Bhattacharya in His Own Words
Dr. Bhattacharya in his own words in 2022 and 2024.


Dr. Bhattacharya Clips
Feel free to add more info in the comments.








Probably one of the first of many high-profile poetic justice moments we’re all due for.
I know. Talk about vindication. I’ve been vindicated about things on a much smaller scale and it is the most amazing and empowering feeling mixed with overwhelming gratitude that the truth has come out and been acknowledged. I can only imagine what this feels like for him.
I feel that. Many of Trump’s appointments have had some level of poetic justice, but perhaps because of the way they so successfully convinced so many Americans to “trust the science” and somehow equate science with only trusting certain voices and allowing no practice of scientific method questions and discovery as part of the “science” — this one feels far more like “poetic justice” far more clearly than any other thus far.