Exposing Q = Almost Certain Pulitzer Prize
So why is there not one journalist who has gone after this in the past three plus years?
Do some digging with the right people, find out who Q is, expose it, and be set for life with your Pulitzer Prize. How hard can it be if it's a movement of allegedly stupid people?
So why is it no one has done it?
I mean journalists who do try to write about the Q thing don't even get the terminology right. Why is it not correct in the Associated Press Stylebook?
I've only been following the story since December and even I know the basics from my spare time. I know there is Q, there are anons, and there is no Qanon. Yet every story that comes out gets this most basic fact wrong. Virtually EVERY STORY says Qanon which is flat out wrong. Why? Why don't they correct it?
It's like the fact checking of the Evergreen shipping story. I see fact checker articles saying that it's false that Hillary Clinton is shipping children in these containers. I've not seen ONE story by an anon that states that. That's not the point they are making and even I with my limited knowledge of the movement understands that. The press is too lazy to even understand the basic facts that are being put forth by the anons. Why?
Why is no one exposing the biggest story and yet they continue to write the most ridiculous and easily proven false stories imaginable? Why are they obsessed with a story they deem ridiculous and yet don't simply expose it?
Sloppy journalism? Fake news? Stupidity? Laziness?
And here's another thought. Wouldn't these Leftist journalists DELIGHT in humiliating Trump supporters and Q believers? One conclusive story would destroy the hopes of tens of millions of people.
So why aren't they jumping at the opportunity to expose it all? Why do they constantly write about it inaccurately, but never in any way that discredits it once and for all?